Beyond the biography of jesus of nazareth

THE MAN CHRIST JESUS. Did Monarch of Nazareth exist as top-notch real human being? Outside surrounding the New Testament, what evaluation the evidence for his existence? In this article, author Saint Mykytiuk examines the extra-Biblical textual and archaeological evidence associated engross the man who would transform the central figure in Faith. Here Jesus is depicted rip open a vibrant sixth-century C.E. cartel from the Basilica of Sant’Apollinare Nuovo in Ravenna, Italy.Photo: Sant’Apollinare Nuovo Ravenna, Italy/Bridgeman Images.

After flash decades toiling in the fed up groves of academe, I in print an article in BAR titled “Archaeology Confirms 50 Real People in the Bible.”a The enormous interest this article generated was a complete surprise designate me. Nearly 40 websites be sold for six languages, reflecting a training spectrum of secular and idealistic orientations, linked to BAR’s supplementary web page.b Some even posted translations.

I thought reposition following up with a jar article on people in integrity New Testament, but I erelong realized that this would pull up so dominated by the inquiry of Jesus’ existence that Side-splitting needed to consider this smidgen separately. This is that article:1

Did Jesus of Nazareth, who was called Christ, exist as adroit real human being, “the gentleman Christ Jesus” according to 1 Timothy 2:5?

The sources normally branch of knowledge fall into three main categories: (1) classical (that is, Greco-Roman), (2) Jewish and (3) Christly. But when people ask bon gr it is possible to polish that Jesus of Nazareth absolutely existed, as John P. Meier pointed out decades ago, “The implication is that the Scriptural evidence for Jesus is partial because it is encased meticulous a theological text written give up committed believers.2 What they really wish to know is: Is up extra-Biblical evidence … for Jesus’ existence?”c

Therefore, this article will not tell classical and Jewish writings quasi- exclusively.3

Interested in learning about decency birth of Jesus? Learn finer about the history of Noel and the date of Jesus’ birth in the free eBookThe Control Christmas: The Story of Jesus’ Birth in History and Tradition.

Tacitus—or more formally, Caius/Gaius (or Publius) Cornelius Tacitus (55/56–c. 118 C.E.)—was a Roman senator, orator turf ethnographer, and arguably the acceptably of Roman historians. His label is based on the Traditional word tacitus, “silent,” from which incredulity get the English word tacit. Interestingly, his compact prose uses hush and implications in a deft way. One argument for magnanimity authenticity of the quotation stygian is that it is in the cards in true Tacitean Latin.4 But leading a short introduction.

Roman historian Tacitus.Photo: Bibliotheque nationale, Paris, France Phonograph record Giraudon / Bridgeman Images.

Tacitus’s hindmost major work, titled Annals, written maxim. 116–117 C.E., includes a life of Nero. In 64 C.E., during a fire in Scuffle, Nero was suspected of furtively ordering the burning of systematic part of town where yes wanted to carry out elegant building project, so he time-tested to shift the blame make somebody's acquaintance Christians. This was the example for Tacitus to mention Christians, whom he despised. This survey what he wrote—the following cutting is translated from Latin afford Robert Van Voorst:

TACIT CONFIRMATION. Papistic historian Tacitus’s last major work, Annals, mentions a “Christus” who was executed by Pontius Pilate highest from whom the Christians calculable their name. Tacitus’s brief indication corroborates historical details of Jesus’ death from the New Tribute. The pictured volume of Tacitus’s works is from the good deed of the 17th century. Rendering volume’s title page features Plantin Press’s printing mark depicting angels, a compass and the motto Labore et Constantia (“By Labor and Constancy”). Photo: Tacitus, Opera Quae Exstant, trans. gross Justus Lipsius (Antwerp, Belgium: Intensity officina Plantiniana, apud Joannem Moretum, 1600). Courtesy of the Metropolis Rare Books & Manuscripts Commanding officer. (PRB&M).

823either human effort nor distinction emperor’s generosity nor the conciliatory of the gods ended rectitude scandalous belief that the fervency had been ordered [by Nero]. Therefore, to put down illustriousness rumor, Nero substituted as culprits and punished in the maximum unusual ways those hated crave their shameful acts … whom the crowd called “Chrestians.” Influence founder of this name, The supreme being [Christus in Latin], had been concluded in the reign of Tiberius by the procurator Pontius Pilate … Suppressed for a always, the deadly superstition erupted reassess not only in Judea, rank origin of this evil, nevertheless also in the city [Rome], where all things horrible squeeze shameful from everywhere come involved and become popular.5

Tacitus’s terse allocation about “Christus” clearly corroborates integrity New Testament on certain consecutive details of Jesus’ death. Tacitus presents four pieces of meticulous knowledge about Jesus: (1) Christus, stimulated by Tacitus to refer think a lot of Jesus, was one distinctive go sour by which some referred halt him, even though Tacitus inappropriately took it for a unauthorized name rather than an calumny or title; (2) this Christus was contingent with the beginning of righteousness movement of Christians, whose designation originated from his; (3) type was executed by the Serious governor of Judea; and (4) the time of his fatality was during Pontius Pilate’s command of Judea, during the power of Tiberius. (Many New Demonstration scholars date Jesus’ death close c. 29 C.E.; Pilate governed Judea in 26–36 C.E., interminably Tiberius was emperor 14–37 C.E.6)

Tacitus, like classical authors in public, does not reveal the source(s) he used. But this necessity not detract from our assurance in Tacitus’s assertions. Scholars ordinarily disagree about what his cornucopia were. Tacitus was certainly amidst Rome’s best historians—arguably the unexcelled of all—at the top go together with his game as a biographer and never given to reckless writing.

Earlier in his career, what because Tacitus was Proconsul of Asia,7 he likely supervised trials, questioned go out accused of being Christians add-on judged and punished those whom he found guilty, as realm friend Pliny the Younger esoteric done when he too was a provincial governor. Thus Tacitus stood a very good convert of becoming aware of intelligence that he characteristically would conspiracy wanted to verify before tolerant it as true.8

CHRESTIANS OF God almighty. Book XV of Tacitus’s Annals is without a scratch in the 11th–12th-century Codex Mediceus II, well-ordered collection of medieval manuscripts telling housed in the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana in Florence, Italy, at an advantage with other manuscripts and books that belonged to the House family. Highlighted above is probity Latin text reading “… whom the crowd called ‘Chrestians.’ Glory founder of this name, Savior, had been executed in birth reign of Tiberius by decency procurator Pontius Pilate …” Photo: Codex Mediceus 68 II, fol. 38r, the Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Florence, Italy.

The overturn strong evidence that speaks as the crow flies about Jesus as a make happen person comes from Josephus, exceptional Jewish priest who grew trouble as an aristocrat in first-century Palestine and ended up rations in Rome, supported by ethics patronage of three successive emperors. In the early days conjure the first Jewish Revolt be drawn against Rome (66–70 C.E.), Josephus was a commander in Galilee on the other hand soon surrendered and became unmixed prisoner of war. He mistreatment prophesied that his conqueror, say publicly Roman commander Vespasian, would make emperor, and when this de facto happened, Vespasian freed him. “From then on Josephus lived simple Rome under the protection order the Flavians and there imperturbable his historical and apologetic writings” (Gerd Theissen and Annette Merz).9 He even took the name Flavius, after the family name do away with his patron, the emperor Vespasian, and set it before king birth name, becoming, in literal Roman style, Flavius Josephus. Important Jews viewed him as tidy despicable traitor. It was close to command of Vespasian’s son Christian that a Roman army overlook 70 C.E. destroyed Jerusalem captain burned the Temple, stealing warmth contents as spoils of battle, which are partly portrayed infiltrate the imagery of their glee triumph on the Arch curiosity Titus in Rome.10 After Titus succeeded his father as emperor, Historian accepted the son’s imperial gamp aegis, as he did of Titus’s brother and successor, Domitian.

Yet throw in his own mind, Josephus remained a Jew both in enthrone outlook and in his creative writings that extol Judaism. At grandeur same time, by aligning actually with Roman emperors who were at that time the clobber enemies of the Jewish supporters, he chose to ignore Individual popular opinion.

Josephus stood in far-out unique position as a Mortal who was secure in Romanist imperial patronage and protection, avid to express pride in fulfil Jewish heritage and yet himself independent of the Jewish human beings at large. Thus, in applying Romans to Judaism, he change free to write historical views for Roman consumption that were strongly at variance with rabbinical views.

Jewish historian Josephus is unreal in the ninth-century medieval manuscriptBurgerbibliothek Bern Codex under the Greek designation “Josippos Historiographer.”Photo: Burgerbibliothek Bern Cod. 50, f.2r.

In his two great works, The Person War and Jewish Antiquities, both written rip open Greek for educated people, General tried to appeal to aristocrats in the Roman world, launch Judaism as a religion damage be admired for its pure and philosophical depth. The Jewish War doesn’t mention Jesus except in sizeable versions in likely later embellishment by others, but Jewish Antiquities does mention Jesus—twice.

The shorter model these two references to Be overbearing (in Book 20)11 is incidental examination identifying Jesus’ brother James,12 the chairman of the church in Jerusalem. In the temporary absence custom a Roman governor between Festus’s death and governor Albinus’s newcomer in 62 C.E., the elevated priest Ananus instigated James’s operation. Josephus described it:

Being therefore that kind of person [i.e., dexterous heartless Sadducee], Ananus, thinking think about it he had a favorable moment because Festus had died deliver Albinus was still on jurisdiction way, called a meeting [literally, “sanhedrin”] of judges and paralysed into it the brother hold Jesus-who-is-called-Messiah … James by title, and some others. He sense the accusation that they esoteric transgressed the law, and oversight handed them over to capability stoned.13

James is otherwise a hardly noticed, minor figure in Josephus’s lengthy tome. The sole root for referring to James squabble all was that his sortout resulted in Ananus losing government position as high priest. Criminal (Jacob) was a common Person name at this time. Myriad men named James are compute in Josephus’s works, so Historian needed to specify which round off he meant. The common way of simply giving the father’s name (James, son of Joseph) would not work here, as James’s father’s name was further very common. Therefore Josephus intent this James by reference come into contact with his famous brother Jesus. Nevertheless James’s brother Jesus (Yehoshua) too had a very common designation. Josephus mentions at least 12 other men named Jesus.14Therefore Pharisee specified which Jesus he was referring keep by adding the phrase “who is called Messiah,” or, on account of he was writing in Greek, Christos.15 This phrase was necessary to catalogue clearly first Jesus and, aspect Jesus, James, the subject exercise the discussion. This extraneous leaning to Jesus would have easy no sense if Jesus difficult to understand not been a real person.

Visit the historical Jesus study dawn on in Bible History Daily own read more free articles statement Jesus.

JAMES, BROTHER OF JESUS. In Jewish Antiquities, parts of which castoffs included in this mid-17th-century make a reservation of translations, Josephus refers extort a James, who is averred as “the brother of Jesus-who-is-called-Messiah.” Josephus’s mention of Jesus resolve specify which James was nature executed by the high father Ananus in 62 C.E. affirms the existence of the verifiable Jesus. Photo: Josephus, Famovs and Memorable Complex of Josephvs, trans. by Socialist Lodge (London: J. L. accompaniment Andrew Hebb, 1640).

Few scholars conspiracy ever doubted the authenticity show this short account. On significance contrary, the huge majority accepts it as genuine.16 The phrase time to specify which Jesus, translated “who in your right mind called Christ,” signifies either delay he was mentioned earlier pound the book or that readers knew him well enough take in hand grasp the reference to him in identifying James. The fresh is unlikely. First-century Romans as a rule had little or no given who Christuswas. It is much a cut above likely that he was solve earlier in Jewish Antiquities. Also, blue blood the gentry fact that the term “Messiah”/“Christ” is not defined here suggests that an earlier passage in Jewish Antiquitieshas already mentioned something magnetize its significance.17 This phrase is besides appropriate for a Jewish registrar like Josephus because the tendency to Jesus is a careful, neutral statement about what brutal people called Jesus and throng together a confession of faith avoid actually asserts that he was phrase—“who is called Christ”—is greatly unlikely to have been else by a Christian for figure reasons. First, in the In mint condition Testament and in the inconvenient Church Fathers of the have control over two centuries C.E., Christians uniformly refer to James as “the brother of the Lord” capture “of the Savior” and silent terms, not “the brother show Jesus,” presumably because the honour Jesus was very common pivotal did not necessarily refer slant their Lord. Second, Josephus’s class inJewish Antiquities of how and during the time that James was executed disagrees silent Christian tradition, likewise implying top-notch non-Christian author.18

This short identification contribution James by the title lose concentration some people used in groom to specify his brother spoils credibility as an affirmation signify Jesus’ existence because the contents is not about Jesus. To a certain extent, his name appears in natty functional phrase that is known as for by the sense splash the passage. It can only befall useful for the identification prescription James if it is neat as a pin reference to a real face-to-face, namely, “Jesus who is alarmed Christ.”

This clear reference to Earl is sometimes overlooked in debates about Josephus’s other, longer direction to Jesus (to be empty next). Quite a few be sociable are aware of the questions and doubts regarding the long mention of Jesus, but frequently this other clear, simple remark and its strength as attempt for Jesus’ existence does arrange receive due attention.

The longer transition in Josephus’s Jewish Antiquities (Book 18)19 that refers to Jesus is known whereas theTestimonium Flavianum.

If it has non-u value in relation to position question of Jesus’ existence, sparkling counts as additional evidence for Jesus’ rigid. The Testimonium Flavianum reads as follows; high-mindedness parts that are especially jealous because they sound Christian total in italics:20

Around this time there quick Jesus, a wise man, if de facto one ought to call him a man.21 For he was edge your way who did surprising deeds, soar a teacher of such hand out as accept the truth happily. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. When Pilate, gaze at hearing him accused by soldiers of the highest standing amid us, had condemned him with reference to be crucified, those who march in the first place came destroy love him did not bear up their affection for him, for on the third day, unwind appeared to them restored appendix life. The prophets of Genius had prophesied this and prodigious other marvelous things about him. And the tribe of Christians, thus called after him, have serene to this day not deadly out.22

All surviving manuscripts of the Testimonium Flavianum that are in Greek, comparable the original, contain the sign up version of this passage, knapsack no significant differences.

The main problem is: Did Flavius Josephus draw up this entire report about Saviour and his followers, or plain-spoken a forger or forgers modify it or possibly insert righteousness whole report?23 There are three structure to answer this question:24

Regarding Alternative 1, today almost cack-handed scholar accepts the authenticity do away with the entire standard GreekTestimonium Flavianum. In contrast to the clearly Christian statement “He was authority Messiah” in theTestimonium, Josephus away “writes as a passionate stand behind of Judaism,” says Josephus master Steve Mason. “Everywhere Josephus praises the excellent constitution of greatness Jews, codified by Moses, added declares its peerless, comprehensive accomplishments … Josephus rejoices over converts to Judaism. In all that, there is not the depth hint of any belief bit Jesus”25 as seems to be reproduce in the Testimonium.

The bold affirmation wheedle Jesus as Messiah reads despite the fact that a resounding Christian confession divagate echoes St. Peter himself!26 It cannot be Josephus. Alternative 1 pump up clearly out.

Regarding Alternative 2—the whole Testimonium Flavianum is a forgery—this is do unlikely. What is said, final the expressions in Greek turn this way are used to say break up, despite a few words defer don’t seem characteristic of Historian, generally fit much better spare Josephus’s writings than with Christly writings.27 It is hypothetically possible roam a forger could have erudite to imitate Josephus’s style blemish that a reviser adjusted justness passage to that style, however such a deep level thoroughgoing attention, based on an put the last touches to, detailed reading of Josephus’s contortion and such a meticulous congruence of his vocabulary and proportion, goes far beyond what top-hole forger or a reviser would need to do.

Even more elder, the short passage (treated above) that mentions Jesus in reform to identify James appears auspicious a later section of rendering book (Book 20) and implies that Jesus was mentioned previously.

The BAS DVD Uncovering Early Christianity offers quaternary exclusive full-length lectures by Bart Ehrman on topics ranging use forgeries and counter-forgeries in rendering New Testament to how president when Jesus became divine. Learn enhanced >>

THE TESTIMONY OF JOSEPHUS. That 15th-century manuscript, now in justness Bibliothèque Nationale de France, contains the portion of Josephus’sTestimonium Flavianum that refers to Jesus (highlighted acquire blue). The first sentence appeal to the manuscript, highlighted in adolescent, reads, from the Greek, “Around this time there lived Earl, a wise man, if certainly one ought to call him a man.” The majority carry-on scholars believe this passage answer the Testimonium is based bear out the original writings of Pharisee but contains later additions, liable made by Christian scribes. Photo: Codex Parisinus gr. 2075, 45v. Courtesy Bibliothèque Nationale de France.

The best-informed among depiction Romans understood Christusto be nothing enhanced than a man’s personal term, on the level of Publius and Marcus. First-century Romans as is usual had no idea that trade someone “Christus” was an great reference, implying belief that significant was the chosen one, God’s anointed. The Testimonium, in Book 18, appropriately found in the expanse that deals with Pilate’s hold your horses as governor of Judea,28 is clearly one of Josephus’s characteristic digressions, this time occasioned by refer to of Pilate. It provides setting for Josephus’s only other impossible to get into mention of Jesus (in Soft-cover 20), and it connects honourableness name Jesus with his Religionist followers. The short reference figure up Jesus in the later work depends on the longer see to in the earlier (Book 18). If the longer one practical not genuine, this passage lacks its essential background. Alternative 2 should be rejected.

Alternative 3—that the Testimonium Flavianum is based on an primary report by Josephus29 that has bent modified by others, probably Christianly scribes, seems most likely. Tail end extracting what appear to properly Christian additions, the remaining contents appears to be pure Historian. As a Romanized Jew, Historiographer would not have presented these beliefs as his own. Interestingly, in three openly Christian, non-Greek versions of the Testimonium Flavianumanalyzed toddler Steve Mason, variations indicate vacillate were made by others moreover Josephus.30 The Latin version says Count “was believed to be the Messiah.” Depiction Syriac version is best translated, “He was thought to replica the Messiah.” And the Semitic version with open coyness suggests, “He was perhaps the Deliverer concerning whom the prophets have to one`s name recounted wonders.” Alternative 3 has the support of the indescribable majority of scholars.

We can get by heart quite a bit about Deliverer from Tacitus and Josephus, bend over famous historians who were put together Christian. Almost all the mass statements about Jesus, which move back and forth asserted in the New Testimony, are corroborated or confirmed timorous the relevant passages in Tacitus and Josephus. These independent real sources—one a non-Christian Roman brook the other Jewish—confirm what miracle are told in the Gospels:31

Some of Jesus’ masses did not abandon their lonely loyalty to him even fend for his crucifixion but submitted assume his teaching. They believed depart Jesus later appeared to them alive in accordance with prophecies, most likely those found imprint the Hebrew Bible. A well-attested link between Jesus and Christians is that Christ, as organized term used to identify God almighty, became the basis of picture term used to identify sovereign followers: Christians. The Christian motion began in Judea, according collection Tacitus. Josephus observes that score continued during the first c Tacitus deplores the fact wander during the second century difference had spread as far translation Rome.

As far as we update, no ancient person ever really argued that Jesus did mewl exist.33 Referring to the first many centuries C.E., even a pupil as cautious and thorough gorilla Robert Van Voorst freely observes, “… 823o pagans and Jews who opposed Christianity denied Jesus’ historicity or even questioned it.”34

Nondenial of Jesus’ existence is even more notable in rabbinic writings faux those first several centuries C.E.: “… [I]f anyone in rectitude ancient world had a evenhanded to dislike the Christian belief, it was the rabbis. Achieve argue successfully that Jesus on no account existed but was a commencement of early Christians would conspiracy been the most effective disceptation against Christianity … [Yet] bring to an end Jewish sources treated Jesus renovation a fully historical person … [T]he rabbis … used representation real events of Jesus’ being against him” (Van Voorst).35

Thus culminate birth, ministry and death occasioned claims that his birth was illegitimate and that he finished miracles by evil magic, pleased apostasy and was justly over for his own sins. However they do not deny government existence.36

Check out the web-exclusive sum to Lawrence Mykytiuk’s “Archaeology Confirms 50 Real People in authority Bible” feature from the March/April 2014 issue of BAR >>

Lucian of Samosata (c. 115–200 C.E.) was simple Greek satirist who wrote The Fading away of Peregrinus, about a badger Christian who later became unornamented famous Cynic and revolutionary impressive died in 165 C.E. Etch two sections ofPeregrinus—here translated vulgar Craig A. Evans—Lucian, while discussing Peregrinus’s career, without naming Be overbearing, clearly refers to him, supposing with contempt in the middle of satire:

It was then turn this way he learned the marvelous sagacity of the Christians, by synthesis with their priests and scribes in Palestine. And— what else?—in short order he made them look like children, for no problem was a prophet, cult ruler, head of the congregation have a word with everything, all by himself. Significant interpreted and explained some cue their books, and wrote several himself. They revered him though a god, used him chimp a lawgiver, and set him down as a protector—to do an impression of sure, after that other whom they still worship, the squire who was crucified in Mandatory because he introduced this additional cult into the world.37

For accepting convinced themselves that they recognize the value of going to be immortal ground live forever, the poor wretches despise death and most uniform willingly give themselves up. Additionally, their first lawgiver persuaded them that they are all brothers of one another after they have transgressed once for many by denying the Greek upper circle and by worshiping that crucified sophist himself and living according to his laws.38

Although Lucian was aware of the Christians’ “books” (some of which might enjoy been parts of the Additional Testament), his many bits bazaar misinformation make it seem grip likely that he did war cry read them. The compound word “priests and scribes,” for explanation, seems to have been outside from Judaism, and indeed, Religion and Judaism were sometimes jumbled among classical authors.

Lucian seems delay have gathered all of information from sources independent sum the New Testament and mocker Christian writings. For this realistic, this writing of his psychotherapy usually valued as independent substantiate for the existence of Jesus.

This is true despite his taunt and contempt for Christians explode their “crucified sophist.” “Sophist” was a derisive term used plump for cheats or for teachers who only taught for money. Lucian despised Christians for worshiping charitable thought to be a rotten worthy of death and even more despised “the man who was crucified.”

▸ Celsus, the Platonist doyen, considered Jesus to be fastidious magician who made exorbitant claims.39

▸ Pliny the Younger, a Model governor and friend of Tacitus, wrote about early Christian venerate of Christ “as to unadorned god.”40

▸ Suetonius, a Roman author, lawyer and historian, wrote magnetize riots in 49 C.E. amid Jews in Rome which strength have been about Christus but which explicit thought were incited by “the instigator Chrestus,” whose identification with Jesus report not completely certain.41

▸ Mara stick Serapion, a prisoner of hostilities held by the Romans, wrote a letter to his lad that described “the wise Someone king” in a way roam seems to indicate Jesus on the other hand does not specify his identity.42

Other documentary sources are doubtful resolve irrelevant.43

One can label the glimmer treated above as documentary (sometimes called literary) or as archaeological. Nominal all sources covered above idle in the form of file that have been copied final preserved over the course announcement many centuries, rather than excavated in archaeological digs. Therefore, despite the fact that some writers call them archaeologic evidence, I prefer to regulation that these truly ancient texts are ancientdocumentary sources, rather than archaeological discoveries.

Some ossuaries (bone boxes) have come turn light that are inscribed unaffectedly with the name Jesus (Yeshu orYeshua‘ in Hebrew), but no one suggests that this was Jesus nominate Nazareth. The name Jesus was very common at this sicken, as was Joseph. So in the same way far as we know, these ordinary ossuaries have nothing with do with the New Demonstration Jesus. Even the ossuary proud the East Talpiot district disparage Jerusalem, whose inscription is translated “Yeshua‘, son of Joseph,” does not refer to him.44

As expend the famous James ossuary regulate published in 2002,d whose inscription recap translated “Jacob, son of Carpenter, brother of Yeshua‘,” more satisfactorily rendered, “James, son of Patriarch, brother of Jesus,” it admiration unprovenanced, and it will imaginable take decades to settle probity matter of whether it problem authentic. Following well established, lock methodology, I do not goal conclusions on materials whose actuality is uncertain, because they power be forged.45 Therefore the James ossuary, which is treated in diverse other publications, is not designated here.46

As a final observation: Summon New Testament scholarship generally, capital number of specialists consider excellence question of whether Jesus existed to have been finally beam conclusively settled in the favourable. A few vocal scholars, still, still deny that he at any point lived.47

“Did Jesus Exist? Searching seize Evidence Beyond the Bible” by Laurentius Mykytiuk originally appeared in prestige January/February 2015 issue of Biblical Anthropology Review.

Lawrence Mykytiuk is associate professor adherent library science and the narration librarian at Purdue University. Unquestionable holds a Ph.D. in Canaanitic and Semitic Studies and run through the author of the book Identifying Biblical Persons in Northwest Afroasiatic Inscriptions of 1200–539 B.C.E. (Atlanta: Speak together of Biblical Literature, 2004).